“And YHWH saw that the evil of humanity was great on the earth, and every inclination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually. And YHWH regretted that He had made man on the earth, and it grieved Him to His heart.”
— Genesis 6:5–6
The passage above is one of the most haunting in the entire Torah. It raises immediate theological and philosophical questions. How can an omniscient God—who knows all things past, present, and future—experience regret? How can a being who is beyond time and not given to human limitation grieve? And was all of humanity truly and utterly wicked?
Let us unpack these questions through a Netzarim Jewish lens.
God’s Regret: Is It Literal?
The Hebrew word used for “regret” is va-yinachem (וַיִּנָּחֶם), which comes from the root n-ch-m, often associated with both “regret” and “comfort.” This same root appears later in Genesis when Noah is named, “saying, ‘This one will comfort (yenachamenu) us in our labor…’” (Gen. 5:29). This word is emotionally complex—it carries tones of deep grief, a shift in intention, and even a desire to console or correct.
Netzarim Judaism teaches us to read these texts symbolically and ethically, not as rigid, literal depictions of divine behavior. To say “God regretted” is not to suggest God was surprised or made a mistake. Rather, it is a poetic way of communicating divine sorrow—a moral reflection projected in terms humanity can comprehend. In this anthropomorphic expression, the Torah reveals God’s ethical alignment. God is not unmoved by human evil. He is not indifferent. He feels—or more accurately, the Torah conveys His moral response in emotive terms to signal the gravity of human corruption.
Omniscience and Divine Emotion
If God is omniscient, how can He regret? Many theologians have wrestled with this question. But within the Netzarim tradition, we do not see omniscience as negating relationality. Rather than imagining God as a detached architect simply watching a pre-written play unfold, we might understand divine knowledge as inclusive of all possibility—past, present, and future—but not deterministic. That is, God knows what will happen, but that does not mean He wills it.
Free will remains central in Biblical Judaism. Thus, God’s sorrow is not surprise at unforeseen behavior, but lament over the choices humanity freely made. His “regret” is His moral stance toward injustice, cruelty, and selfishness. His grief is real—not because He didn’t see it coming, but because He hoped for better. Like a parent mourning the path of a wayward child, God’s heartbreak is a call to conscience.
Was All Humanity Evil?
Genesis 6:5 says, “every inclination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually.” This hyperbolic phrasing is not uncommon in Biblical literature. It should not be read as a metaphysical indictment of human nature as inherently corrupt—something later Christian doctrine would promote. Instead, it is a dramatic summation of a societal state of moral collapse.
Indeed, just a few verses later, Noah is singled out as “a righteous man, blameless in his generation” (Gen. 6:9). Clearly, there were exceptions. The passage is a condemnation of the prevailing culture, not of all individual humans without distinction.
In fact, the idea that humanity is inherently evil contradicts the Torah’s consistent teaching that we are created b’tzelem Elohim—in the image of God (Gen. 1:27). The issue in Genesis 6 is not nature, but choice. It is not that humans are evil by design, but that they had filled the earth with violence (chamas) through a long series of misused freedoms.
Something Deeper: A Warning to Every Generation
Rather than view this story as ancient history or divine wrath, Netzarim Judaism challenges us to read it as a mirror. Genesis 6 is a moral warning: when violence, corruption, and ethical apathy become normalized, even the Divine mourns. The flood is not about punishment so much as it is about cleansing a world spiraling toward self-destruction.
God’s grief is our call to return.
Every generation risks becoming “like the days of Noah” when human hearts harden and society stops caring for the weak. God’s sorrow is not just theological—it is prophetic. It reminds us that justice, kindness, and responsibility are not luxuries, but necessities for survival.
Final Thoughts
The grief of God in Genesis 6 is not a contradiction of omniscience—it is a reflection of God’s relational nature and moral depth. The idea that God can “regret” or be “sorrowful” is not to suggest imperfection, but to emphasize His ethical expectations of us.
Rather than debate metaphysical exactitudes, we are invited to heed the message: our actions matter. God cares. And when the world grows dark, it is not indifference but heartbreak that fills the heavens.
Discover more from Rabbi Ian Adams
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
